Evaluation of bond strength of glass and resin-ceramics with laser phototherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Laser phototherapy has been studied as a surface treatment capable of increasing the adhesion of cement to the ceramic surface. However, the bond strength of glass and resin-ceramics after laser phototherapy is unclear. PURPOSE: The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the bond strength of glass and resin-ceramics using laser therapy and conventional hydrofluoric acid etching. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and was registered in the Open Science Framework (OSF) for in vitro studies. A population, intervention, control, and outcome (PICO) question was formulated: "Does phototherapy promote better bond strength in glass and resin-ceramics than conventional hydrofluoric acid etching?" A literature search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ProQuest databases up to January 2023. The Joanna Briggs Institute critical assessment guidelines for quasi-experimental studies were used for quality assessment. The meta-analysis was based on the inverse variance (IV) method (α=.05). RESULTS: A total of 6 in vitro studies published between 2007 and 2019 with a total number of 348 specimens were included for qualitative analysis; 1 study had a positive effect. Five of the studies were included in the meta-analysis, which indicated a significant decrease for feldspathic ceramics that received laser phototherapy and lithium disilicate (P=.002; MD: -2.15; 95% CI: -3.53 to -0.77; I2=89%, P<.01) and (P<.01; MD: -2.13; 95% CI: -2.99 to -1.27; I2=82%, P<.01), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Laser irradiation as surface etching of glass ceramics does not produce a bond strength equal to that of conventional hydrofluoric acid etching.

Is the clinical performance of internal conical connection better than internal non-conical connection for implant-supported restorations? A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

PURPOSE: To evaluate bone loss, prosthodontics and biological complications, and implant survival rates of internal conical connections (ICC) compared with internal non-conical connection (INCC) implants. METHODS: The systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021237170). Meta-analysis was performed using standardized mean difference (SMD) for bone loss and risk ratio (RR) for implant survival and complication rates. Risk of bias analysis was evaluated using RoB 2.0, whereas the GRADE tool was used to evaluate the certainty of evidence. A systematic search of the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane, and ProQuest databases was performed independently by two reviewers for articles published up to March 2022. The search criteria had no language or publication date restrictions. Handsearching analysis was performed in the reference list of potential articles. RESULTS: Twelve randomized clinical trials, including 678 patients and 1006 implants (ICC [n = 476]; INCC [n = 530]), were included. Meta-analysis revealed that ICC demonstrated a lower risk for marginal bone loss (SMD: -0.80 mm; p = 0.004) and prosthodontics complications (RR: 0.16; p = 0.01) than INCC. However, both internal connections demonstrated no significant difference in implant survival rates (RR: 0.54; p = 0.10) and biological complications (RR: 0.90; p = 0.82). The overall risk of bias revealed some concerns and a low risk of bias for most of the included studies. However, the certainty of evidence of outcomes was considered low to moderate. CONCLUSION: ICC may be considered a more favorable treatment option than INCC owing to greater preservation of peri-implant bone tissue and a lower probability of prosthodontics complications. However, well-conducted studies with long-term follow-up are warranted.

Are implant-supported removable partial dentures a suitable treatment for partially edentulous patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: A consensus on the clinical performance of implant-supported removable partial dentures (ISRPDs) is lacking. PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the clinical performance of ISRPDs in terms of the implant survival rates, marginal bone loss, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Four electronic databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) were independently searched by 2 reviewers for articles published up to December 2020. A single-arm meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the implant survival rates and marginal bone loss by using the R program. The Cochrane collaboration tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for non-RCT studies. RESULTS: Sixteen studies were included, with a total of 334 participants and a mean age of 58 years. The participants received a total of 581 dental implants, 475 conventional and 106 mini-implants. All included studies reported implant survival rate above 90% (range: 92% to 100%). Meta-analysis indicated a high proportion of implant survival rates of 3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2% to 5%) and a low mean raw score of marginal bone loss 0.98 mm (CI: 0.61 to 1.36 mm). Compared with conventional RPDs, improved patient quality of life and satisfaction were reported by studies that evaluated ISRPDs. RCT studies exhibited a low risk of bias for most domains, while most non-RCT studies were classified as good quality. CONCLUSIONS: ISRPDs exhibited high implant survival rates and acceptable bone loss with improvement in the quality of life and satisfaction of patients when compared with conventional RPDs. Therefore, they can be considered suitable for the rehabilitation of partially edentulous patients.

Influence of Different Restoring Materials on Stress Distribution in Prosthesis on Implants: A Review of Finite Element Studies.

The selection of material used on the occlusal surface of implant-supported prostheses is important, as these materials can transmit destructive forces to the interface between the alveolar bone and the implant. Different prosthetic materials are suggested for implant-supported prostheses. The choice of prosthetic material is a controversial issue, and there is a consensus that implant survival is not affected by the prosthetic material. Three-dimensional finite element studies are often used in dentistry to estimate the stress distribution that occurs in the implant system, peri-implant bone, and prosthetic components. To analyze the influence of the prosthetic restorative material on the stresses in bone tissue and peri-implant through a literature review of three-dimensional finite element studies. The search for articles was performed in the PubMed/Medline database up to November 2021. The selected articles were independently evaluated by two different reviewers. The information collected was author and year of publication, dimensions of implants used, the material used in the prosthetic crown, simulated force and direction, and conclusion and effect. After searching, 14 studies were selected for full reading, and based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, all could be included in this review. The articles were based on evidence-based laboratory medicine. After analyzing these articles, it was concluded that the prosthetic materials used on the occlusal surface do not interfere with the destruction of stresses to the bone and peri-implant tissue, both in single prostheses and protocol-type prostheses, when three-dimensional finite element method is used.

Mechanical properties of polymethyl methacrylate as a denture base: Conventional versus CAD-CAM resin - A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The development of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) resin blocks with reported improved mechanical properties has simplified complete denture production. However, whether the objective of improved mechanical properties has been achieved compared with conventional heat-polymerized PMMA is not yet clear. PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the mechanical properties of denture base resins manufactured by conventional heat-polymerization and by CAD-CAM in terms of flexural strength, flexural modulus, and surface roughness. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Electronic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science) were independently searched by 2 researchers for relevant studies published up to November 2020. The population, intervention, comparison, and outcome (PICO) question was, "Does the conventionally manufactured, heat-polymerized PMMA resin, as a denture base, demonstrate the same mechanical properties as the CAD-CAM resin block?" In addition, a meta-analysis was based on the inverse variance method. Flexural strength, flexural modulus, and surface roughness were analyzed through the continuous outcome evaluated by mean difference and standard deviation, with 95% confidence intervals. To evaluated heterogeneity, the I2 value (≤25%=low, ≥50%=moderate and ≥75%=high) and the P value were considered. P<.10 indicated statistical difference for heterogeneity. The effects of meta-analysis were based on the results of heterogeneity as per the studies. RESULTS: Thirteen in vitro studies were included in the analysis. A total of 507 specimens were evaluated, 222 conventional and 285 CAD-CAM. In terms of flexural strength, the data showed no significant difference when conventional heat-polymerized PMMA was compared with CAD-CAM PMMA resins (P=.06; mean difference=18.28; 95% confidence interval:-0.42 to 36.97). In terms of flexural modulus, there was a significant difference for the CAD-CAM PMMA group (P=.01; mean difference=589.22; 95% confidence interval: 117.95 to 1060.48). In terms of surface roughness, a significant difference was observed between the groups (P=.02; mean difference=-0.53; 95% confidence interval: -0.97 to -0.09) with the conventional heat-polymerized PMMA resin having higher surface roughness values. CONCLUSIONS: The mechanical properties of CAD-CAM PMMA resins were generally improved when compared with heat-polymerized polymethyl methacrylate resin.

Does the use of an adhesive improve conventional complete dentures? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: A consensus on whether the use of a complete-denture adhesive provides a clinical benefit remains unclear. PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review of randomized controlled trials was to evaluate the use of adhesive in complete dentures in terms of retention and stability, patient-reported outcomes measures, and masticatory performance. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for articles up to October 2020. The Cochrane collaboration tool was used to analyze the risk of bias. The grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations (GRADE) tool was used to assess the certainty of the evidence. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included with a total of 516 participants with a mean age of 65.5 years. Most studies reported a significant improvement in the retention and stability, patient-reported outcomes measures, and masticatory performance of complete dentures with the use of denture adhesive compared with no-denture adhesive. Newly developed denture adhesives were reported to have promising results. Most studies presented a low risk of bias, but the certainty of the evidence was classified as low to moderate. CONCLUSIONS: Participants had improved treatment outcomes when using denture adhesives because they significantly improve the retention and stability, patient-reported outcomes measures, and masticatory performance. However, further high-quality studies are needed to confirm these results with newly developed denture adhesives.

Avaliação do tipo de retenção e o uso de diferentes intermediários na adaptação de próteses unitárias sobre implantes / Evaluation of the type of retention and the use of different abutments in the adaptation of single prostheses on implants

Atualmente, devido a perda do elemento dentário e a procura por um tratamento estético e principalmente funcional, a reabilitação com próteses sobre implante tem sido amplamente empregada, com elevada previsibilidade a longo prazo. Com isso, muito tem sido relatado na literatura acerca das possíveis complicações dessa modalidade de tratamento, principalmente relacionado às possibilidades de falhas mecânicas das próteses implantossuportadas. Por isso, o objetivo do presente projeto foi avaliar a influência na adaptação marginal e interna, da utilização do intermediário protético e do tipo de retenção das próteses (parafusada e cimentada) em implantes cone morse submetidos à ciclagem mecânica. Foram confeccionados 40 corpos de prova, no qual cada um tinha a presença de um implante, com as dimensões de 4mm de diâmetro e 11,5mm de comprimento cone morse (n = 40). Dessa forma, foi avaliado a influência da utilização do intermediário e dos sistemas de retenção em cada conexão de maneira específica. Metade dos corpos de prova de cada sistema de conexão foram confeccionados em UCLA (n=20, sendo 10 parafusadas e 10 cimentadas), enquanto que a outra metade foi utilizado um intermediário pré-fabricado (Pilar Universal (n=20, sendo 10 parafusadas e 10 cimentadas). Os corpos de prova foram submetidos à ciclagem mecânica submersos em água destilada simulando um tempo clínico de cinco anos. Além disso, foram avaliados quanto ao torque e destorque (N) e adaptação marginal e interna (µm) antes e após a ciclagem mecânica. Os dados provenientes das mensurações foram organizados em tabela em formato Excel (Microsoft Office Excel, Redmond, WA, Estados Unidos) e submetidos ao software SigmaPlot (SigmaPlot, San Jose, CA, EUA) versão 12.0. Todos os dados foram analisados inicialmente com a utilização da estatística descritiva. Em seguida, os dados para intrusão (valores positivos), extrusão (valores negativos), destorque inicial, destorque final, e descimentação foram analisados em relação a distribuição de normalidade (teste Shapiro-Wilk e igualdade de variância) e, posteriormente, foi adotada a Análise de Variância (ANOVA) a um fator (Grupos diferentes materiais: G1 a G4), quando houve normalidade dos dados, o pós teste de Tukey foi adotado para as comparações múltiplas, quando não foi identificado uma distribuição normal, empregou-se o teste de Kruskall-Wallis e pós-teste de Dunn's ou Tukey, semelhantemente foi realizada a análise específica das variáveis pilares (UCLA e Pilar Universal) e sistemas de retenção (Parafusado e Cimentado). Para todos os testes aplicou-se nível de significância de 5% (α=0,05). A análise gráfica foi considerada através de um gráfico de barras para os dados que apresentaram normalidade com valores de média e desvio padrão, e as demais análises que não apresentaram normalidade foi considerado a confecção de um boxplot para cada grupo comparativo. As próteses sobre implante utilizando pilares em zircônia tem ganhado cada vez mais espaço, além do estudo in vitro, foi realizada uma revisão sistemática para comparar a perda óssea marginal e as complicações próteticas de reabilitações utilizando pilares de zircônia cimentado e parafusado. Em relação as próteses cimentadas e parafusadas, devido as evidências conflitantes e a presença de muitas revisões sistemáticas sobre o tema, foi realizada uma overview de revisões sistemáticas, com o objetivo de compilar as informações disponiveis e avaliar a qualidade metodologica desses estudos a respeito das complicações presentes nas próteses sobre implante cimentadas ou parafusadas(AU)

Currently, due to the loss of the dental element and the search for an aesthetic and mainly functional treatment, rehabilitation with implant prostheses has been widely used, with high long-term predictability. Thus, much has been reported in the literature about the possible complications of this treatment modality, mainly related to the possibility of mechanical failure of implant-supported prostheses. Therefore, the objective of the present project was to evaluate the influence on the marginal and internal adaptation, the use of the prosthetic intermediate and the type of retention of the prostheses (screwed and cemented) in morse taper implants submitted to mechanical cycling. 40 specimens were made, in which each one had an implant, with dimensions of 4 mm in diameter and 11.5 mm in length (n = 40). In this way, the influence of the use of intermediaries and retention systems in each connection was evaluated in a specific way. Half of the specimens of each connection system were made in UCLA (n=20, being 10 screwed and 10 cemented), while the other half was used a prefabricated intermediate (Universal Abutment (n=20, being 10 screwed) and 10 cemented). The specimens were submitted to mechanical cycling submerged in distilled water simulating a clinical time of five years. In addition, they were evaluated for torque and detorque (N) and marginal and internal adaptation (µm) before and after mechanical cycling. Data from measurements were organized in a table in Excel format (Microsoft Office Excel, Redmond, WA, USA) and submitted to SigmaPlot software (SigmaPlot, San Jose, CA, USA) version 12.0. All data were initially analyzed using descriptive statistics. Then, data for intrusion (positive values), extrusion (negative values), initial detorque, final detorque, and debonding were analyzed in relation to dist determination of normality (Shapiro-Wilk test and equality of variance) and, later, the one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was adopted (Different material groups: G1 to G4), when there was normality of the data, the Tukey post test was adopted for multiple comparisons, when a normal distribution was not identified, the Kruskall-Wallis test and Dunn's or Tukey post-test were used, similarly the specific analysis of the pillar variables (UCLA and Universal Pillar) and systems retainer (Screwed and Cemented). For all tests, a significance level of 5% (α=0.05) was applied. The graphical analysis was considered through a bar graph for the data that presented normality with mean and standard deviation values, and the other analyzes that did not present normality was considered the creation of a boxplot for each comparative group. Implant prostheses using zirconia abutments have gained more and more space, in addition to the in vitro study, a systematic review was performed to compare marginal bone loss and prosthetic complications of rehabilitations using cemented and screwed zirconia abutments. Regarding cemented and screw-retained prostheses, due to conflicting evidence and the presence of many systematic reviews on the subject, an overview of systematic reviews was performed, with the objective of compiling the available information and evaluating the methodological quality of these studies regarding complications present in cemented or screw-retained implant prostheses(AU)

Do ball-type attachment systems for overdenture result in better patient-satisfaction? A systematic review of randomized crossover clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: This review is to compare patient-satisfaction with ball-type overdenture attachment systems with others attachment systems. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018097234) and adheres the PRISMA guidelines. Electronic searches on PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases for published articles were performed before October 2020. The PICO question was: "Do patients with a ball-type overdenture retention system have greater satisfaction, when compared to other attachment systems?" The evaluation of risk of bias was performed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. RESULTS: After searching the databases, seven articles were selected out of a total of 2583. A total of 312 implants were placed in 139 patients, with a mean age of 65.9 years. The risk of bias in the included studies varied according to the different domains in a risk of uncertain bias or low bias risk. No difference was found between the ball attachment systems and the others systems, with respect to patient-satisfaction. The meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant difference between the ball systems and another systems (P = 0.11; MD: 10.90; 95% CI: -2.55 to 24.35). CONCLUSIONS: Regarding patient general satisfaction, it was not possible to determine differences between the ball system and another types of attachment system for overdenture. The ball-type system was statistically superior only to the magnet system.

Use of chlorhexidine chip after scaling and root planning on periodontal disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to assess the efficacy chlorhexidine chip as an adjunctive therapy of scaling and root planning on periodontal disease treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PRISMA) and was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42019148221). The search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases until April 2020. The PICO question was: "Is the chlorhexidine chip (CHX) effective as an adjunctive therapy of scaling and root planning on periodontal disease treatment?". Inclusion criteria involved: randomized controlled clinical trials, with a minimum of 15 patients included on the sample and each patient has two sites of probing depth of ≥5 mm; The minimum follow up was at least 1 months of follow-up and the outcomes present in the studies probing depth (PD), plaque index (PI) and clinical attachment level (CAL) after scaling and root planning (SRP). RESULTS: After searching the databases, 13 articles were selected for qualitative and 8 for quantitative analysis. Were included 427 patients, with a mean age of 45.6 years. The results shown that the association of chlorhexidine chips to scaling and root planning reduce periodontal pocket depths (P < 0.00001; MD -0.77 [CI -1.0 to -0.55]; I2 = 23%, P = 0.24), gain on the clinical attachment level (P < 0.0001; MD -0.57 [CI -0.86 to -0.27]; I2 = 33%, P = 0.18P < 0.0001) and reduction on plaque index (P = 0.04; MD -0.23 [CI -0.45 to -0.01]; I2 = 91%, P < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: Thus, we can conclude that chlorhexidine chip when used associated to scaling and root planning promoted a significant improvement the reduction of periodontal diseases.

Perfil sociodemográfico e odontológico de usuários de próteses totais do programa de extensão universitária Resgatando Sorrisos / Sociodemographic and dental profile of users of total protheses in the university extention program "Resgatando Sorrisos"

Objetivo: Realizar uma análise transversal do perfil sociodemográfico e clínico de pacientes edêntulos bimaxilares e dos hábitos de uso das suas próteses totais (PT) antigas. Posteriomente, os participantes foram reabilitados com próteses totais, em um período de 3 anos (2017- 2019)), em três municípios do estado de Pernambuco - Brasil, por meio de um programa de extensão universitária. Métodos: 58 participantes foram avaliados por meio de um questionário composto de 73 questões. Os dados coletados permitiram uma avaliação quantitativa, e o nível de significância considerado foi de 0,05. Resultados: Destaca-se um perfil de pacientes idosos com uma média de tempo de desdentado total de 24,3±15,3 anos (maxila) e 22,14±14,22 (mandíbula), havendo uma maior prevalência de usuários com próteses bimaxilares (74%). Destaca-se em 57,1% da amostra, a predo-minância da escovação com creme dental e, em 42,9%, a utilização de sabão/detergente, solução de hipoclorito de sódio (NaClO) e/ou bicarbonato de sódio (NaHCO3) como coadjuvantes na higienização. Além disso, 66,6% da amostra apresentou necessidade de intervenção clínica para reparos na PT. Com relação aos hábitos deletérios, os idosos apre-sentaram menos o hábito de dormir com a prótese quando comparados a adultos (p≤0,001). Conclusão: O perfil dos participantes apresentou prevalência do gênero feminino e idade média de 63 anos, além de uma média de 20 anos desdentados (maxila e mandíbula), um tempo elevado de uso das próteses (>10 anos) e o hábito de uso contínuo. Mais da metade dos participantes utilizava métodos de higienização inadequados.

Objective: To conduct a cross-sectional analysis of the sociodemographic and clin-ical profile of edentulous bimaxillary patients and their habits of using old complete den-tures (CD).Subsequently, the participants were rehabilitated with complete dentures, in three years (2017-2019), in three municipalities located in the state of Pernambuco, - Bra-zil, through a university extension program. Methods: We evaluated a total of 58 partici-pants through a questionnaire with 73 questions. Data collected were used for quantitative assessment, and the level of significance was set at 0.05. Results: Most of the participants were elderly patients with an average total edentulous time of 24.3 ± 15.3 years, and 22.14 ± 14.22 years at the maxilla and mandible, respectively. In addition, there was a high prev-alence of users who had bimaxillary prostheses (74%). In 57.1% of the sample, there was a predominance of brushing with toothpaste, 42.9% used soap/detergent, sodium hypochlo-rite solution, and (or) sodium bicarbonate as adjuvants in cleaning. Moreover, 66.6% of the patients needed a clinical intervention for CD repairs. About the harmful habits, the elderly showed a less frequent habit of sleeping with their prostheses compared to the adults (p ≤ 0.001). Conclusion: Most of the participants were female with an average age of 63 years. They presented an average of 20 years of edentulousness (maxilla and mandible) and the extended use of the dentures (> 10 years), in addition to the habit of continuous use. More than half of the participants used inadequate cleaning methods.